FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers

Tue May 24 14:20:28 UTC 2022

CAF nor RDOF required IPv6.  BEAD doesn't say anything about IPv6.  I
seriously doubt v6 gets included into the conversation because even NANOG
can't agree it is needed.  The bigger concern are the people that have no
connectivity at all (no 1 mbps, no 25/3, no 100/20, no gigabit, etc).

On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 9:41 AM j k <jsklein at gmail.com> wrote:

> With this funding, does the FCC require IPv6 and/or dual stack?  If not,
> it could cause a new IPv6 digital divide.
>
> Joe Klein
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2022, 9:21 AM Max Tulyev <maxtul at netassist.ua> wrote:
>
>> Do they help with a local government ("we do not need your cables, go
>> avway")?
>>
>> 23.05.22 21:56, Sean Donelan пише:
>> >
>> > Money, money, money.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, 23 May 2022, Aaron Wendel wrote:
>> >
>> >> The Fiber Broadband Association estimates that the average US
>> >> household will need more than a gig within 5 years.  Why not just jump
>> >> it to a gig or more?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 5/23/2022 1:40 PM, Sean Donelan wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-proposes-higher-speed-goals-small-rural-broadband-providers-0
>> >>>
>> >>> The Federal Communications Commission voted [May 19, 2022] to seek
>> >>> comment on a proposal to provide additional universal service support
>> >>> to certain rural carriers in exchange for increasing deployment to
>> >>> more locations at higher speeds. The proposal would make changes to
>> >>> the Alternative Connect America Cost Model (A-CAM) program, with the
>> >>> goal of achieving widespread deployment of faster 100/20 Mbps
>> >>> broadband service throughout the rural areas served by rural carriers
>> >>> currently receiving A-CAM support.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20220524/564e0194/attachment.html>