FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers

j k jsklein at gmail.com
Tue May 24 13:41:00 UTC 2022


With this funding, does the FCC require IPv6 and/or dual stack?  If not, it
could cause a new IPv6 digital divide.

Joe Klein

On Tue, May 24, 2022, 9:21 AM Max Tulyev <maxtul at netassist.ua> wrote:

> Do they help with a local government ("we do not need your cables, go
> avway")?
>
> 23.05.22 21:56, Sean Donelan пише:
> >
> > Money, money, money.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 23 May 2022, Aaron Wendel wrote:
> >
> >> The Fiber Broadband Association estimates that the average US
> >> household will need more than a gig within 5 years.  Why not just jump
> >> it to a gig or more?
> >>
> >>
> >> On 5/23/2022 1:40 PM, Sean Donelan wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-proposes-higher-speed-goals-small-rural-broadband-providers-0
> >>>
> >>> The Federal Communications Commission voted [May 19, 2022] to seek
> >>> comment on a proposal to provide additional universal service support
> >>> to certain rural carriers in exchange for increasing deployment to
> >>> more locations at higher speeds. The proposal would make changes to
> >>> the Alternative Connect America Cost Model (A-CAM) program, with the
> >>> goal of achieving widespread deployment of faster 100/20 Mbps
> >>> broadband service throughout the rural areas served by rural carriers
> >>> currently receiving A-CAM support.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20220524/4cb49d81/attachment.html>


More information about the NANOG mailing list