Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Sat Mar 12 08:21:01 UTC 2022
Because it is a single Internet, and what we do in some parts of Internet will affect others?
Because, at least in my case, I'm investing my efforts in what it seems to be the best in the long-term for the global community, not my personal preferences?
El 12/3/22 9:10, "William Herrin" <bill at herrin.us> escribió:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 11:58 PM JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
<nanog at nanog.org> wrote:
> Exactly, many previous unsuccessful discussions at IETF about 240/4: IPv6 is the only viable long-term solution.
> The effort to “reinvent” any part of IPv4 or patches to it, then test that everything keeps working as expected, versus the benefits and gained time, it is much best invested in continue the IPv6 deployment which is already going on in this region and the rest of the world.
> It would not make sense, to throw away all the efforts that have been already done with IPv6 and we should avoid confusing people.
> I just think that even this thread is a waste of time (and will not further participate on it), time that can be employed in continue deploying IPv6.
Why are so many otherwise smart engineers so vulnerable to false
dilemma style fallacies? There's no "either/or" here. It's not a zero
sum game. If you don't see value in doing more with IPv4 then why
don't you get out of the way of folks who do?
bill at herrin.us
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
More information about the NANOG