Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?
Grant Taylor
gtaylor at tnetconsulting.net
Sat Mar 20 17:40:23 UTC 2021
On 3/20/21 8:54 AM, Valdis Klētnieks wrote:
> And adding "topic" tags to the subject line doesn't actually help the
> food-fight scenario, as those can break out even in [TOPIC] tagged
> threads. To tilt it the rest of the way from sub-optimal to outright
> pessimal is the fact that some subscribers may find a thread has gone
> off into the weeds, while others consider all the details interesting.
This is one of the reasons that I really prefer the dynamic topic
detection. If messages in a thread no longer have the necessary key
words which define a topic, Mailman doesn't consider it to be part of
that topic. If a different thread veers into a topic and has the
necessary key words which define the other topic, Mailman considers it
to be part of that other topic.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4013 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20210320/966cf9ba/attachment.bin>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list