DoD IP Space

scott surfer at mauigateway.com
Sun Feb 14 00:00:45 UTC 2021


On 2/12/2021 8:39 PM, Mark Tinka wrote:
> On 2/12/21 21:56, scott wrote:
>>
>> 100% agreed!  Been whining about that here many times.  I have been 
>> trying to get IPv6 going for a long time, but the above stopped my 
>> plans.  One thing I mentioned recently, though, is we just got a 
>> $BIGCUSTOMER and their requirement was we do IPv6. So keep your IPv6 
>> deployment plans ready.  In my case they said a 'we need it right 
>> now' kind of thing.  That could happen to anyone here.
>
> How about just doing it and then asking for forgiveness later :-)?
>
> That's what I did in 2005, but fair point, the network was only 2 
> routers big and in just one city :-).
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


I would be looking for a new job and it is a much larger network than 2 
routers is a big city.  :)    Sabri Berisha was correct: "The true enemy 
here is mid-level management that refuses to prioritize deployment of 
IPv6.   What we should be discussing is how best to approach that 
problem. It's where ops and corporate politics overlap."   What I always 
heard when I bring it up and they don't want to talk about it was 
"What's the business case?" They know there isn't one.

scott



More information about the NANOG mailing list