Google peering in LAX

Mon Mar 2 22:35:14 UTC 2020

Yes… That’s correct.

Owen

> On Mar 2, 2020, at 2:20 PM, Hugo Slabbert <hugo at slabnet.com> wrote:
> 
> I believe Owen was referring here to Google's actions: that the disagg is the antisocial behaviour and that transit providers (the people they are paying) would be more tolerant of that antisocial behaviour than would be peers (the people they are not paying). 
> 
> On Mon., Mar. 2, 2020, 13:19 Seth Mattinen <sethm at rollernet.us <mailto:sethm at rollernet.us>> wrote:
> On 3/2/20 12:44 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> > In part, it might be because people you’re not paying may be less tolerant of anti-social behavior than people you are paying.
> > 
> 
> I'm not sure how I was being offensive but OK.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20200302/96933057/attachment.html>