non-rate limited, automatable Looking Glasses?
Lars Prehn
lprehn at mpi-inf.mpg.de
Sun Jul 19 09:49:00 UTC 2020
Hi Baldur,
Yes, you are right. While, in general, Looking Glasses would be optimal,
those LGs that I know have rules in place that prohibit automated
requests and also limit the number of queries one can enter manually.
Best regards,
Lars
On 19.07.20 11:05, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
> Just trying to clarify the question. If you observe a BGP route to
> 1.2.3.0/24 <http://1.2.3.0/24> with AS path 1 2 3, you want to do a
> traceroute to confirm that the packets indeed travel through ASNs 1, 2
> and 3?
>
> I would think that traceroute will have to be run directly on the same
> router that provides the BGP feed.
>
> Regards
>
> Baldur
>
>
> lør. 18. jul. 2020 23.34 skrev Lars Prehn <lprehn at mpi-inf.mpg.de
> <mailto:lprehn at mpi-inf.mpg.de>>:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> In the next couple of months, I want to compare data plane and
> control
> plane measurements on a larger scale. In particular, I'm looking for
> (publicly accessible) devices that receive BGP feeds and can
> perform a
> bunch of automated (paris) traceroutes. I currently do not have an
> exact
> probing rate or target set in mind; however, I'm sure that manually
> entering IP addresses as targets for usual Looking glasses won't
> cut it.
> Does anyone know less-restricted (maybe even automatable?) Looking
> Glasses (or similar devices) or is willing to provide access to one?
>
> BTW: I though about picking Atlas probes from ASes that feed BGP
> Collector Projects (e.g. RIPE RIS or RouteViews). Unfortunately, the
> respective probes are often really far apart from the feeding
> routers;
> thus, their individual perspectives are likely misaligned :(
>
> Best regards,
>
> Lars
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20200719/39f5118d/attachment.html>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list