QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential

Wed Feb 26 15:19:41 UTC 2020

It's okay though, because we freed up UDP/53 by moving DNS to TCP/443, 
so then we can move HTTPS to UDP/53.

On 2/21/20 6:37 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> First we moved the entire internet to TCP/443.
>
> Now we propose moving it all to UDP/53.
>
> What’s next? Why not simply eliminate port numbers altogether in favor 
> of a single 16-bit client-side unique session identifier.
>
> Owen
>
>> On Feb 21, 2020, at 15:20 , Matthew Petach <mpetach at netflight.com 
>> <mailto:mpetach at netflight.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020, 13:31 Łukasz Bromirski <lukasz at bromirski.net 
>> <mailto:lukasz at bromirski.net>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>     [...]
>>
>>     Now… once we are aware, the only question is — where we go from here?
>>
>>     —
>>     ./
>>
>>
>>
>> Well, it's clear the UDP 443 experiment wasn't entirely successful.
>>
>> So clearly, it's time to use the one UDP port that is allowed through 
>> at the top of everyone's ACL rules, and update QUIC in the next 
>> iteration to use UDP/53.
>>
>> *THAT* should solve the whole problem, once and for all.
>>
>> ;)
>>
>> Matt
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20200226/e0835f8a/attachment.html>