QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential
Owen DeLong
owen at delong.com
Fri Feb 21 23:37:41 UTC 2020
First we moved the entire internet to TCP/443.
Now we propose moving it all to UDP/53.
What’s next? Why not simply eliminate port numbers altogether in favor of a single 16-bit client-side unique session identifier.
Owen
> On Feb 21, 2020, at 15:20 , Matthew Petach <mpetach at netflight.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020, 13:31 Łukasz Bromirski <lukasz at bromirski.net <mailto:lukasz at bromirski.net>> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> Now… once we are aware, the only question is — where we go from here?
>
> —
> ./
>
>
> Well, it's clear the UDP 443 experiment wasn't entirely successful.
>
> So clearly, it's time to use the one UDP port that is allowed through at the top of everyone's ACL rules, and update QUIC in the next iteration to use UDP/53.
>
> *THAT* should solve the whole problem, once and for all.
>
> ;)
>
> Matt
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20200221/163169be/attachment.html>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list