QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential

Sat Feb 22 01:24:42 UTC 2020

At this pace and having adopted CI/CD methodology, we may QUICkly run out of UDP ports to use.

I’d actually switch to ICMP. Type 8 code 0 and Type 0, code 0. Then staging a war on rate-limiters around the world.

Also, 123/udp seems to look interesting ;)

-- 
./

> On 22 Feb 2020, at 00:21, Matthew Petach <mpetach at netflight.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020, 13:31 Łukasz Bromirski <lukasz at bromirski.net> wrote:
>> 
>> [...]
>> 
>> Now… once we are aware, the only question is — where we go from here?
>> 
>> — 
>> ./
> 
> 
> 
> Well, it's clear the UDP 443 experiment wasn't entirely successful.
> 
> So clearly, it's time to use the one UDP port that is allowed through at the top of everyone's ACL rules, and update QUIC in the next iteration to use UDP/53.
> 
> *THAT* should solve the whole problem, once and for all.
> 
> ;)
> 
> Matt
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20200222/240a2cfe/attachment.html>