yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request]

Sat Jan 12 23:27:26 UTC 2019

>
> By the way, since that you've left no traces of whatever piece of work
> you've posted to that list. The website is empty, slides are removed
> from Speakerdeck, etc.
> In theory, I can easily recall a few cases in my life when going
> through just 50 words was quite enough for a judgment.

Yes, 50 words are more than enough to decide a bad idea is bad.  You don't
> have to like that, or like any of us, but facts are facts

Guys, I can't able to disclose my work at this point. But I'm happy to
publish my work again next month.  In the meantime, I have no issues if you
all think my work is bad.

But if you all think, my work has some novelty and this man made the wrong
choice, be sure to tell that too.

On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 4:51 AM Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan <giri at dombox.org>
wrote:

> I don't know why you are all try to defend a man who try to silence my
> work.
>
> Are you saying this thread is necessary?
>
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 4:46 AM Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 12:51 AM Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan
>> <giri at dombox.org> wrote:
>> > 5 months back I posted my spam research on DMARC list.
>> > You have gone through only 50 words and judged my work.
>> > The whole thread gone haywire because of you. I was
>> > humiliated there and left.
>>
>> By the way, since that you've left no traces of whatever piece of work
>> you've posted to that list. The website is empty, slides are removed
>> from Speakerdeck, etc.
>>
>> In theory, I can easily recall a few cases in my life when going
>> through just 50 words was quite enough for a judgment.
>>
>> > To be very honest, I don't like you.
>>
>> Please keep our busy mailing list out of this information, though for
>> me it's a valuable piece of data that someone I don't know personally
>> doesn't like someone else.
>>
>> > Although I don't like you, I still managed to respond politely in
>> > IETF lists. Again... In that list the only thing you did was
>> > attacking my work.
>>
>> So, I've read the whole thread, and, as far as I can see, there was
>> nothing coming from John except for a balanced judgement.
>>
>> > And then please tell me this man is not biased at all.
>>
>> Sorry, he's not.
>>
>> --
>> Töma
>>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan
> Dombox, Inc.
>

-- 
Best Regards,

Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan
Dombox, Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190113/bbfb28f3/attachment.html>