Should ISP block child pornography?

Tue Dec 11 19:06:11 UTC 2018

It is my understanding that ISPs block IP addresses and domains under court
order now for copyright violations, criminal activity which would include
CP. They require a court order as they cannot ascertain if it is CP or not,
that is a Law Enforcement decision. The US Supreme Court decision's was
just being nude is not lewd, also with aging software which can regress
photos, LEOs in the US have to ascertain if this is CP or photo shopped.

On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 12:54 PM Max Tulyev <maxtul at netassist.ua> wrote:

> ...and you will see the TOR exit nodes instead of crime home IP if
> censorship is implemented.
>
> 11.12.18 19:35, Aaron1 пише:
> > ... The only thing I can think of is the idea that I’ve heard before is
> > the way to catch someone is to watch them well they are accessing, the
> > concept of honeypots comes to mind
> >
> > Aaron
> >
> > On Dec 11, 2018, at 10:43 AM, Larry Allen <mrallen1971 at gmail.com
> > <mailto:mrallen1971 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >> I can't imagine a single rational argument against this.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018, 10:56 William Anderson <neuro at well.com
> >> <mailto:neuro at well.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>     On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 at 06:08, Lotia, Pratik M
> >>     <Pratik.Lotia at charter.com <mailto:Pratik.Lotia at charter.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >>         Hello all, was curious to know the community’s opinion on
> >>         whether an ISP should block domains hosting CPE (child
> >>         pornography exploitation) content? Interpol has a ‘worst-of’
> >>         list which contains such domains and it wants ISPs to block it.
> >>
> >>
> >>     This already happens in the UK, and has done for years.
> >>
> >>     https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_abuse_image_content_list
> >>
> >>
> >>     -n
> >>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20181211/151bb033/attachment.html>