Open Letters to Sixxs
tayeb.meftah at gmail.com
Thu Sep 15 10:01:33 CDT 2011
Good thinking mike
i do have a VoIp carrier single homed with Cogent.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Jones" <mike at mikejones.in>
To: "Meftah Tayeb" <tayeb.meftah at gmail.com>
Cc: "Arjan Van Der Oest" <Arjan at voiceworks.nl>; <nanog at nanog.org>;
<ipv6-ops at lists.cluenet.de>
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 4:58 PM
Subject: Re: Open Letters to Sixxs
> On 15 September 2011 15:12, Meftah Tayeb <tayeb.meftah at gmail.com> wrote:
>> ok, that's a positive answer.
>> but let me ask you a question:
>> do HE.NET peer with cogent? level3?
> 4 189 ms 134 ms 99 ms 10gigabitethernet7-4.core1.nyc4.he.net
> 5 131 ms 152 ms 111 ms 2001:470:0:202::2
> 6 144 ms 147 ms 238 ms 2001:1900:19:7::4
> 7 132 ms 241 ms 143 ms vl-4060.car2.NewYork2.Level3.net
> [Jitter is my cable connection, not reflective of the performance of
> HEs network]
> As for cogent - Does anyone really care? this is only a problem for
> reaching a single homed network behind cogent, and anyone running such
> a network knows that their IPv6 connectivity doesn't work properly
> anyway and they are the broken ones.
> Whatever you think of the issues surrounding the peering dispute (I am
> sure at least comcast agree with cogent that a Tier 1 network should
> pay what is essentially a Tier 2 network for peering!), the fact
> remains that HE did get there first with their defacto tier 1 status,
> and for the time being at least "working IPv6" is realistically
> "working IPv6 connection to HE and peers".
> The more users/content that is behind HE and peers that is not
> reachable from cogent the better, as it puts more pressure on them to
> start behaving themselves and peering properly like everyone else.
> - Mike
> __________ Information provenant d'ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version de la
> base des signatures de virus 6465 (20110915) __________
> Le message a été vérifié par ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
__________ Information provenant d'ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version de la base des signatures de virus 6465 (20110915) __________
Le message a été vérifié par ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
More information about the NANOG