Email Portability Approved by Knesset Committee
cian.brennan at redbrick.dcu.ie
Mon Feb 22 16:27:40 UTC 2010
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 04:24:54PM +0000, Robert Brockway wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010, James Jones wrote:
>> Why does this seem like a really bad idea?
> While I think the principal is noble there are operational problems:
> 1) Large and increasing quantity of email will be forwarded between
> Israeli ISPs, loading their networks with traffic that could have been
Same thing applies to mobile companies. Realistically, this isn't going to be a
particularly massive amount of traffic.
> 2) Every time someone changes ISP and wants to continue using this
> address they will need to notify their original ISP, who they may not
> have had a business relationship with for many years. This will be a
> significant operational challenge I expect. How do you confirm the
> person notifying you is the real owner of the address, for example?
This bit is slightly more difficult. All the same, you can easily figure out a
password system for talking to support (with a login password, and a support
password, say. Not the most secure thing possible, but in practise as good as
any ISPs mail system's is likely to be.)
> IMHO it would have been better to require the ISPs to forward the email
> for a reasonable period of time (say 3 months) to allow the user to make
> relevant notifications (or just stop using an ISP bound email address).
Changing an email address takes far longer than 3 months, ime. I still get the
odd mail to one I stopped using 3-4 years ago.
> Unfortunately the links cited are in Hebrew so I'm only going on Gadi's
> report here.
> Email: robert at timetraveller.org
> IRC: Solver
> Web: http://www.practicalsysadmin.com
> I tried to change the world but they had a no-return policy
More information about the NANOG