[Update] Re: New ISP to market, BCP 38, and new tactics

Wed Feb 4 01:53:32 UTC 2009

Agreed.  Keeping it separate works very well.  Can be the same interface
sure... but do it as a separate session.

...Skeeve

-----Original Message-----
From: Nathan Ward [mailto:nanog at daork.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, 4 February 2009 12:40 PM
To: nanog list
Subject: Re: [Update] Re: New ISP to market, BCP 38, and new tactics

On 4/02/2009, at 2:33 PM, Steve Bertrand wrote:

> - Currently, (as I write), I'm migrating my entire core from IPv4 to
> IPv6. I've got the space, and I love to learn, so I'm just lab-ing  
> it up
> now to see how things will flow with all iBGP v4 routes being
> advertised/routed over v6.

Don't advertise v4 prefixes in v6 sessions, keep them separate.

If you do, you have to do set next-hops with route maps and things,  
it's kind of nasty.

Better to just run a v4 BGP mesh and a v6 BGP mesh.

--
Nathan Ward