Email peering (Was: Economics of SPAM [Was: Micorsoft's Sender IDAuthentication......?]
Joe St Sauver
JOE at OREGON.UOREGON.EDU
Thu Jun 16 20:06:12 UTC 2005
Of course, there's already one application-level messaging
protocol that relies extensively on arranged peerings: Usenet.
Usenet doesn't rely on a *full* N-way mesh of arranged peerings,
it relies instead on a core of fairly well interconnected
"backbone" or "core" news sites who've agreed to do feeds with
each other, as well as to feed downstream "leaf nodes" (either
on a for-fee commercial basis, or gratis as part of a regional
consortia or whatever).
To receive traffic or originate traffic, a leaf node doesn't
need to peer with every other news server, it just needs to do
feeds with a couple of upstream core sites to insure that it has
reasonable coverage and redundancy.
Spam isn't much of a problem on Usenet anymore because peers who
tend to have spam issues tend to clean them up or get depeered
or shunned...
There's no reason why one couldn't build a comparable model
for mail, with the SMTP speciality service provider offering
"SMTP transit" to a base of trusted customers. This comparatively
small number of SMTP speciality provider would then maintain
good relations ("peerings") with the comparatively small
number of major ISPs. Oh wait -- there are a variety of folks
who are already specializing in doing that sort of thing --
it's just that most folks don't need to buy that sort of
service (yet).
Regards,
Joe St Sauver (joe at uoregon.edu)
University of Oregon Computing Center
More information about the NANOG
mailing list