Email peering (Was: Economics of SPAM [Was: Micorsoft's Sender IDAuthentication......?]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Thu Jun 16 14:48:13 UTC 2005
On 16/06/05, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer at nic.fr> wrote:
> The proponents of "email peering" typically want to switch from the
> current model (millions of independant email servers) to a different
> model, with only a few big actors.
>
> "Should anyone be allowed to operate an email system? Perhaps not."
> Carl Hutzler
> http://www.circleid.com/article/917_0_1_0_C/
I just don't see where Carl advocates email peering there.
More like "should J Random Luser be given control of mailservers" or
"Should Wile E Coyote be allowed to buy Dynamite and gadgets from the
Acme Company?"
That, and "if you want to operate a mailserver, get a static IP"
--srs
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)
More information about the NANOG
mailing list