Advice on dealing with Sprint

Thu Sep 26 17:51:44 UTC 1996

"Perry E. Metzger" writes:
> Not, you understand, that I think the global routing table should be
> kept in control,

Obviously that was a typo -- I think everyone agrees that the global
routing table *must* be kept in control...

> but I find it to be extraordinarily annoying that in
> a world where cheap PCs have been able to take 128meg on their
> motherboards for years (indeed, many can take far more!) and in which
> workstations frequently have 64M of memory in them, there are routers
> (many still sold!) which lack the slots to take more than 32M of
> memory.
> 
> Perry