Compu$erve RFC 1123 5.3.3 violation

Fri Nov 15 22:26:00 UTC 1996

The following bounce from Comp$Serve violates RFC 1123 5.3.3.  They have
been repeatedly informed of this and refuse to fix their mail system.
Hence mailing lists here prevent subscription by Compu$erve addressees.
I suggest that others, e.g. the nanog list, do the same.

randy

Message-ID: <961115221415_515664.456256_JHO109-62 at CompuServe.COM>
Date: 15 Nov 96 17:14:16 EST
From: Electronic Postmaster <POSTMASTER at CompuServe.COM>
Comments: Returned from:  <103311.571 at CompuServe.COM>
Message-Type: Delivery Report
To: Randy Bush <rbush at wna.net>
Subject: Undeliverable message

Your message could not be delivered for the following reason:

Mailbox 103311.571 is currently full.
Please resend your message at a later time.

--- Returned message ---

Sender: owner-nanog at merit.edu
Received: from merit.edu (merit.edu [35.1.1.42]) by hil-img-2.compuserve.com (8.6.10/5.950515)
	id RAA08607; Fri, 15 Nov 1996 17:14:11 -0500
Received: from localhost (daemon at localhost) by merit.edu (8.7.6/merit-2.0) with SMTP id QAA12118; Fri, 15 Nov 1996 16:50:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: by merit.edu (bulk_mailer v1.5); Fri, 15 Nov 1996 16:50:32 -0500
Received: (from daemon at localhost) by merit.edu (8.7.6/merit-2.0) id QAA12106 for nanog-outgoing; Fri, 15 Nov 1996 16:50:32 -0500 (EST)
Received: from rip.psg.com (root at rip.psg.com [147.28.0.39]) by merit.edu (8.7.6/merit-2.0) with SMTP id QAA12099 for <nanog at merit.edu>; Fri, 15 Nov 1996 16:50:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: by rip.psg.com 
	id m0vOW9V-0007zfC; Fri, 15 Nov 96 13:50 PST (Smail3.1.29.1#1)
Message-Id: <m0vOW9V-0007zfC at rip.psg.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 96 13:50 PST
To: Scott Huddle <huddle at mci.net>
Cc: nanog at merit.edu
From: Randy Bush <rbush at wna.net>
Subject: Re: The Cidr Report
References: <199611152058.PAA17223 at new6.Reston.mci.net>
Sender: owner-nanog at merit.edu

>> Number of ASes announcing only one prefix:  737 (378 cidr, 359 classful
> Wow!  Is a correct assumption that some 40% of the ASs could be 
> reclaimed?

I do not see how you get to this conclusion.  He did not say number of ASs
which only appear through one other unique AS, i.e. are single homed.  Oh,
Joel!

>> Largest number of  cidr routes:                    461 announced by AS3561
>> Largest number of classful routes:                1266 announced by  AS174
> Neat stuff.  Could you list the top ten or five of each of these?

What is a 'top' prefix?  Lowest IP?  Shortest prefix?  Actually, for
embarrassment sake, I would want to see the most likely candidates for
aggregation.  But if I wanna see it, I can look in one of my routers.

>> Top 20 Withdrawn Routes from 08Nov96 to 15Nov96
>> 	-304  AS174 Performance Systems International
> Are congrats due to PSI?

Far out!  Maybe so!  

>> 	 -50 AS2914 WNA, premasticated for MCI :-)
> ???

Sorry.  I have to convert my RADB RPSL one into a placeholder RIPE-181++ for
the MCI-RR, and that's the descr:.  For the real aut-num: see the RADB.  I
would think Tony would be picking up the latter.  Old habits, TB?

randy