Compu$erve RFC 1123 5.3.3 violation
Jared Mauch
jared at wolverine.hq.cic.net
Fri Nov 15 23:00:20 UTC 1996
I agree. They should say deferred and let sendmail retry until
the local configuration says to bounce a warning or return the message.
I will note, students.uiuc.edu also does this if a mailbox
is full.
- Jared
Randy Bush graced my mailbox with this long sought knowledge:
> The following bounce from Comp$Serve violates RFC 1123 5.3.3. They have
> been repeatedly informed of this and refuse to fix their mail system.
> Hence mailing lists here prevent subscription by Compu$erve addressees.
> I suggest that others, e.g. the nanog list, do the same.
>
> randy
>
>
> Message-ID: <961115221415_515664.456256_JHO109-62 at CompuServe.COM>
> Date: 15 Nov 96 17:14:16 EST
> From: Electronic Postmaster <POSTMASTER at CompuServe.COM>
> Comments: Returned from: <103311.571 at CompuServe.COM>
> Message-Type: Delivery Report
> To: Randy Bush <rbush at wna.net>
> Subject: Undeliverable message
>
> Your message could not be delivered for the following reason:
>
> Mailbox 103311.571 is currently full.
> Please resend your message at a later time.
>
> --- Returned message ---
>
> Sender: owner-nanog at merit.edu
> Received: from merit.edu (merit.edu [35.1.1.42]) by hil-img-2.compuserve.com (8.6.10/5.950515)
> id RAA08607; Fri, 15 Nov 1996 17:14:11 -0500
> Received: from localhost (daemon at localhost) by merit.edu (8.7.6/merit-2.0) with SMTP id QAA12118; Fri, 15 Nov 1996 16:50:34 -0500 (EST)
> Received: by merit.edu (bulk_mailer v1.5); Fri, 15 Nov 1996 16:50:32 -0500
> Received: (from daemon at localhost) by merit.edu (8.7.6/merit-2.0) id QAA12106 for nanog-outgoing; Fri, 15 Nov 1996 16:50:32 -0500 (EST)
> Received: from rip.psg.com (root at rip.psg.com [147.28.0.39]) by merit.edu (8.7.6/merit-2.0) with SMTP id QAA12099 for <nanog at merit.edu>; Fri, 15 Nov 1996 16:50:28 -0500 (EST)
> Received: by rip.psg.com
> id m0vOW9V-0007zfC; Fri, 15 Nov 96 13:50 PST (Smail3.1.29.1#1)
> Message-Id: <m0vOW9V-0007zfC at rip.psg.com>
> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 96 13:50 PST
> To: Scott Huddle <huddle at mci.net>
> Cc: nanog at merit.edu
> From: Randy Bush <rbush at wna.net>
> Subject: Re: The Cidr Report
> References: <199611152058.PAA17223 at new6.Reston.mci.net>
> Sender: owner-nanog at merit.edu
>
> >> Number of ASes announcing only one prefix: 737 (378 cidr, 359 classful
> > Wow! Is a correct assumption that some 40% of the ASs could be
> > reclaimed?
>
> I do not see how you get to this conclusion. He did not say number of ASs
> which only appear through one other unique AS, i.e. are single homed. Oh,
> Joel!
>
> >> Largest number of cidr routes: 461 announced by AS3561
> >> Largest number of classful routes: 1266 announced by AS174
> > Neat stuff. Could you list the top ten or five of each of these?
>
> What is a 'top' prefix? Lowest IP? Shortest prefix? Actually, for
> embarrassment sake, I would want to see the most likely candidates for
> aggregation. But if I wanna see it, I can look in one of my routers.
>
> >> Top 20 Withdrawn Routes from 08Nov96 to 15Nov96
> >> -304 AS174 Performance Systems International
> > Are congrats due to PSI?
>
> Far out! Maybe so!
>
> >> -50 AS2914 WNA, premasticated for MCI :-)
> > ???
>
> Sorry. I have to convert my RADB RPSL one into a placeholder RIPE-181++ for
> the MCI-RR, and that's the descr:. For the real aut-num: see the RADB. I
> would think Tony would be picking up the latter. Old habits, TB?
>
> randy
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list