100G-LR1 (DR/FR)

Ca By cb.list6 at gmail.com
Fri Mar 31 13:51:07 UTC 2023

On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 6:23 AM Jared Mauch <jared at puck.nether.net> wrote:

> The common tech is 100G-LR4 these days - I'm wondering how many operators
> are supporting the LR1 to allow its use on 400G and future 800G optics as
> those use breakout to support 100G ports.
> Would you rather do a 400G port on a router vs 100LR1?
> Curious what others think.

We use a lot of 100g-FR

For dense deployment and limited faceplate space, 100g-fr / dr are the only

LR4 is dead to me.

> Sent via RFC1925 compliant device
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20230331/81239074/attachment.html>

More information about the NANOG mailing list