Request for comments

Etienne-Victor Depasquale edepa at ieee.org
Wed Mar 8 09:27:17 UTC 2023


Quick (and critical) correction:

bar charts on the ***left*** are from *NOGs;
bar charts on the ***right*** are from commissioned market research.

Cheers,

Etienne

On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 2:06 PM Etienne-Victor Depasquale <edepa at ieee.org>
wrote:

> The picture changes significantly when an operator's choice is weighted by
> his current subscriber base.
> Evidently, incumbents have lots of copper media, while smaller operators
> (more agile?) are laying fibre and mostly growing GPON on it.
>
> Rebuttals are welcome !
>
> Unweighted data
> <https://drive.google.com/open?id=1eZZeqbDaTj6nSJJDdK0iu5Xm9Z_691rR&authuser=etienne.depasquale%40um.edu.mt&usp=drive_fs>
>
> Weighted data
> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fMLiEGbvaD4pqCmQM75HWYoR37XaiHFQ/view?usp=sharing>
> (weighted by number of subscribers)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Etienne
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 5:32 PM Etienne-Victor Depasquale <edepa at ieee.org>
> wrote:
>
>> I've updated the graphic
>> <https://drive.google.com/open?id=1eZZeqbDaTj6nSJJDdK0iu5Xm9Z_691rR&authuser=etienne.depasquale%40um.edu.mt&usp=drive_fs>
>> with one other data point and increased the graphic's size (following
>> feedback).
>>
>> In particular, I'd like to understand why there are so many operators who
>> consider Active Ethernet (p2p)
>> to be their largest and/or fastest growing access technology.
>>
>> Would anyone care to give an opinion / interpretation / perspective /
>> other ?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Etienne
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 9:24 AM Etienne-Victor Depasquale <edepa at ieee.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Good people of NANOG,
>>>
>>> Please find here
>>> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eZZeqbDaTj6nSJJDdK0iu5Xm9Z_691rR/view?usp=sharing>
>>> a snapshot of two datasets concerning access technologies in the metro area.
>>>
>>> The bar chart on the right summarizes data I collected last year from
>>> *NOGs;
>>> the bar chart on the left summarizes data received last year from Tier 1
>>> and/or regional operators (incumbents).
>>> The y-axis shows cumulative responses for an option; the x-axis shows
>>> (hopefully unambiguous) monikers for the access technologies.
>>>
>>> Would anyone care to comment on how well this matches his/her perception
>>> of the current state of deployments?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Etienne
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ing. Etienne-Victor Depasquale
>>> Assistant Lecturer
>>> Department of Communications & Computer Engineering
>>> Faculty of Information & Communication Technology
>>> University of Malta
>>> Web. https://www.um.edu.mt/profile/etiennedepasquale
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ing. Etienne-Victor Depasquale
>> Assistant Lecturer
>> Department of Communications & Computer Engineering
>> Faculty of Information & Communication Technology
>> University of Malta
>> Web. https://www.um.edu.mt/profile/etiennedepasquale
>>
>
>
> --
> Ing. Etienne-Victor Depasquale
> Assistant Lecturer
> Department of Communications & Computer Engineering
> Faculty of Information & Communication Technology
> University of Malta
> Web. https://www.um.edu.mt/profile/etiennedepasquale
>


-- 
Ing. Etienne-Victor Depasquale
Assistant Lecturer
Department of Communications & Computer Engineering
Faculty of Information & Communication Technology
University of Malta
Web. https://www.um.edu.mt/profile/etiennedepasquale
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20230308/88810f40/attachment.html>


More information about the NANOG mailing list