Request for comments

Fri Mar 3 16:32:27 UTC 2023

I've updated the graphic
<https://drive.google.com/open?id=1eZZeqbDaTj6nSJJDdK0iu5Xm9Z_691rR&authuser=etienne.depasquale%40um.edu.mt&usp=drive_fs>
with one other data point and increased the graphic's size (following
feedback).

In particular, I'd like to understand why there are so many operators who
consider Active Ethernet (p2p)
to be their largest and/or fastest growing access technology.

Would anyone care to give an opinion / interpretation / perspective / other
?

Cheers,

Etienne

On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 9:24 AM Etienne-Victor Depasquale <edepa at ieee.org>
wrote:

> Good people of NANOG,
>
> Please find here
> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eZZeqbDaTj6nSJJDdK0iu5Xm9Z_691rR/view?usp=sharing>
> a snapshot of two datasets concerning access technologies in the metro area.
>
> The bar chart on the right summarizes data I collected last year from
> *NOGs;
> the bar chart on the left summarizes data received last year from Tier 1
> and/or regional operators (incumbents).
> The y-axis shows cumulative responses for an option; the x-axis shows
> (hopefully unambiguous) monikers for the access technologies.
>
> Would anyone care to comment on how well this matches his/her perception
> of the current state of deployments?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Etienne
>
> --
> Ing. Etienne-Victor Depasquale
> Assistant Lecturer
> Department of Communications & Computer Engineering
> Faculty of Information & Communication Technology
> University of Malta
> Web. https://www.um.edu.mt/profile/etiennedepasquale
>

-- 
Ing. Etienne-Victor Depasquale
Assistant Lecturer
Department of Communications & Computer Engineering
Faculty of Information & Communication Technology
University of Malta
Web. https://www.um.edu.mt/profile/etiennedepasquale
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20230303/829590bc/attachment.html>