100G-LR1 (DR/FR)

Tyler Conrad Tyler at tgconrad.com
Tue Apr 4 16:03:47 UTC 2023


Tangentially related to xR1, have any of you started deploying SN
connectors on your 400G head-ends? It looks like a pretty clever
technology, adding discrete connectors per lane, but curious what the
adoption has been thus far.

On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 8:55 AM Mikael Abrahamsson via NANOG <nanog at nanog.org>
wrote:

> On Tue, 4 Apr 2023, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
> > We are willing to do 100G-LR1 if someone asks these days.  It lets us be
> > able to roll it up into 400G optics on our side as appropriate.
>
> I hope the industry moves to 100G-LR1, as doing 2x100GBASE-LR4 in a 400G
> port is quite meh when it comes to faceplate capacity.
>
> Unfortunately 100GBASE-LR4 will be with us for a long long time.
>
> --
> Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20230404/2a1a96f7/attachment.html>


More information about the NANOG mailing list