Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Re: 202203210957.AYC

Mon Mar 21 19:36:53 UTC 2022

Dear John:

1)    "  ... everyone, said it's a foolish idea ... ":     Oh, 
"everyone", really? Are you sure? Please name a couple who expressed 
their judgments based on */facts/*. Otherwise, you may be fooling 
everyone with rumors to perpetuate a myth.

2)    By the way, through constructive criticism, we learned to 
characterize our EzIP as an */overlay/* network. With this very concise 
definition, EzIP is now ready to face real bullets. You may want to 
follow discussions about our work more closely.

Regards,

Abe (2022-03-21 15:36)

------------------------------
NANOG Digest, Vol 170, Issue 23
Message: 5
Date: 20 Mar 2022 13:58:18 -0400
From: "John Levine"<johnl at iecc.com>
To:nanog at nanog.org
Cc:aychen at avinta.com
Subject: Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Re: 202203151549.AYC
Message-ID:<20220320175819.7C27C3976150 at ary.qy>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

It appears that Abraham Y. Chen<aychen at avinta.com>  said:

> ??? C.??? Recently, we were made aware of the Int-Area activities.
> Attempts to reach the Group Chairs have not received any responses.
>
> ??? D.??? I just received an Int-Area Digest Vol 199, Issue 14
> requesting IETF to reactivate the IPv4 support.

For people who don't follow the IETF lists, here's a summary of
the responses.  Mr. Chen thought it was a good idea, everyone
else, and I mean everyone, said it's a foolish idea and not
worth pursuing.

R's,
John

------------------------------

-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20220321/21d3725f/attachment.html>