Re udp port overload on ipv4 (was Re: V6 still not supported)

William Herrin bill at
Thu Mar 10 19:56:50 UTC 2022

On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 11:43 AM Dave Taht <dave.taht at> wrote:
> I am deeply concerned by the onrushing move to udp for QUIC, with udp
> the former province of voip, gaming, request/response and
> videoconferencing traffic.

Hi Dave,

Since QUIC is without value unless it works with widely deployed NAT
there's not exactly an alternative. Glad to see that they, at least,
have learned from the IPv6 deployment debacle.

Bill Herrin

William Herrin
bill at

More information about the NANOG mailing list