V6 still not supported (was Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock))

Masataka Ohta mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp
Thu Mar 10 11:22:55 UTC 2022

Saku Ytti wrote:

> Same. And if we don't voluntarily agree to do something to it, it'll
> be the same in 2042, we fucked up and those who come after us pay the
> price of the insane amount of work and cost dual stack causes.

Indeed, we don't need IPv6 at all at least for the next 20 years,
which is long enough to have 32bit port length for TCP and UDP to
make NAT save address space more efficiently.

						Masataka Ohta

More information about the NANOG mailing list