FCC BDC engineer?

Andrew Latham lathama at gmail.com
Tue Jul 5 19:39:30 UTC 2022


Josh, you are correct, I linked to the wrong document.

On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 1:36 PM Josh Luthman <josh at imaginenetworksllc.com>
wrote:

> Andrew,
>
> Where does it say that it is or is not required?  This is a request for
> clarification filed by the CCA.
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 1:59 PM Andrew Latham <lathama at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I read https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-22-543A1.pdf and a PE
>> is not required.
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 9:47 AM KCI Dave Logan via NANOG <nanog at nanog.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all.  We operate a small regional ISP in Colorado, but no size is too
>>> small to ignore the FCC, as you all know.
>>>
>>> We're really struggling to find the required engineer for the filing,
>>> and we're small enough that we don't have an officer with engineering
>>> credentials.
>>>
>>> Any pointers in the CO/WY/NE/KS area would be great, on or off list.
>>>
>>> I sure hope we're the only org with this problem still, and all the rest
>>> of you are good to go.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> dave
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Dave Logan
>>> Kentec Communications, Inc.
>>> 970-522-8107
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> - Andrew "lathama" Latham -
>>
>

-- 
- Andrew "lathama" Latham -
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20220705/4197d28e/attachment.html>


More information about the NANOG mailing list