FCC BDC engineer?

Josh Luthman josh at imaginenetworksllc.com
Tue Jul 5 20:10:07 UTC 2022


As of last week our discussions with the FCC have still not determined the
official ruling.  Again, my personal opinion is that it will not require a
PE stamp but rather depend on an individual to be a professional engineer.

On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 3:39 PM Andrew Latham <lathama at gmail.com> wrote:

> Josh, you are correct, I linked to the wrong document.
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 1:36 PM Josh Luthman <josh at imaginenetworksllc.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Andrew,
>>
>> Where does it say that it is or is not required?  This is a request for
>> clarification filed by the CCA.
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 1:59 PM Andrew Latham <lathama at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I read https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-22-543A1.pdf and a PE
>>> is not required.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 9:47 AM KCI Dave Logan via NANOG <nanog at nanog.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all.  We operate a small regional ISP in Colorado, but no size is
>>>> too small to ignore the FCC, as you all know.
>>>>
>>>> We're really struggling to find the required engineer for the filing,
>>>> and we're small enough that we don't have an officer with engineering
>>>> credentials.
>>>>
>>>> Any pointers in the CO/WY/NE/KS area would be great, on or off list.
>>>>
>>>> I sure hope we're the only org with this problem still, and all the
>>>> rest of you are good to go.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> dave
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Dave Logan
>>>> Kentec Communications, Inc.
>>>> 970-522-8107
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> - Andrew "lathama" Latham -
>>>
>>
>
> --
> - Andrew "lathama" Latham -
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20220705/b10b9497/attachment.html>


More information about the NANOG mailing list