LEC copper removal from commercial properties

Sun Feb 20 16:06:42 UTC 2022

I think this goes back to 2016. This explains it better than I could.

https://publicknowledge.org/the-fccs-plan-to-gut-tech-transitions-rules-is-bad-for-consumers-small-businesses-and-competition/

Essentially Mr.Pai didn't change the rules, he pushed through the order
( FCC-16-90 ) that redefined what things meant so that the rules became
toothless.

On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 11:44 AM Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. <amitchell at isipp.com>
wrote:

>
>
> > I had the same thought and dug into it. I traced the email chain
> backwards as well as the office phone. The email (and named employee) are
> legit as well as the switch serving the office line. Everything adds up. I
> don't have a reason to believe it's a scam. They also noted they will
> abandon existing infra in place. Good observation. Thanks!
>
> The way they are going about it, and the fact that they are
> misrepresenting the FCC's rules, and that the tenants are left holding the
> mess, is the scam.
>
> Anne
>
> --
> Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law
> CEO Get to the Inbox by SuretyMail
> Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal email marketing
> law)
> Author: The Email Deliverability Handbook
> Board of Directors, Denver Internet Exchange
> Dean Emeritus, Cyberlaw & Cybersecurity, Lincoln Law School
> Prof. Emeritus, Lincoln Law School
> Chair Emeritus, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop
> Legal Counsel: The CyberGreen Institute
> In-house Counsel: Mail Abuse Prevention System (MAPS) (Closed in 2004)
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20220220/803e7a4e/attachment.html>