Sites blocking ISP Addresses

Fri Dec 2 04:23:18 UTC 2022

On 12/1/22 10:21 AM, Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote:
> The WAF is under control of the site, but many sites blindly implement 
> the recommendations of the WAF provider.

I have heard tell of a CDN / WAF that is generally held in good regard 
having a free tier that many people use that is much less flexible than 
the paid tiers.  As in things are enabled by default and you can't 
disable them.  --  I have no first hand experience with said CDN / WAF 
save as a consumer behind such CDN / WAF.

-- 
Grant. . . .
unix || die

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4017 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20221201/018000cf/attachment.bin>