IRR for IX peers
Mark Tinka
mark at tinka.africa
Thu Oct 7 14:54:26 UTC 2021
On 10/7/21 16:33, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> there was more to it than that. The grammar was too complicated to
> easily describe common policies and too limited to describe complex
> policies. The structure was difficult to extend when the routing
> became more complicated (e.g. mpls, route servers, ipv6, complex ibgp,
> etc). The tooling was too complicated for anyone to understand
> properly how it worked and too early to benefit from later additions,
> e.g. scripting language plugins. If it had been an easy problem
> domain to fix, it would have been fixed a long time ago, but it wasn't.
All the reasons I tried and gave up, back in 2003.
Mark.
More information about the NANOG
mailing list