IRR for IX peers
Nick Hilliard
nick at foobar.org
Thu Oct 7 14:33:27 UTC 2021
Randy Bush wrote on 07/10/2021 15:26:
> it was sabatoged
there was more to it than that. The grammar was too complicated to
easily describe common policies and too limited to describe complex
policies. The structure was difficult to extend when the routing became
more complicated (e.g. mpls, route servers, ipv6, complex ibgp, etc).
The tooling was too complicated for anyone to understand properly how it
worked and too early to benefit from later additions, e.g. scripting
language plugins. If it had been an easy problem domain to fix, it
would have been fixed a long time ago, but it wasn't.
Nick
More information about the NANOG
mailing list