Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public

Thu Nov 18 13:30:42 UTC 2021

This is actually worse than our collective progress on replacing v4 to
date.

-jim

On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 7:31 PM Jay R. Ashworth <jra at baylink.com> wrote:

> This seems like a really bad idea to me; am I really the only one who
> noticed?
>
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-schoen-intarea-unicast-127-00.html
>
> That's over a week old and I don't see 3000 comments on it, so maybe it's
> just
> me.  So many things are just me.
>
> [ Hat tip to Lauren Weinstein, whom I stole it from ]
>
> Cheers,
> -- jra
>
> --
> Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink
> jra at baylink.com
> Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC
> 2100
> Ashworth & Associates       http://www.bcp38.info
> St Petersburg FL USA      BCP38: Ask For It By Name!           +1 727 647
> 1274
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20211118/0eec9c45/attachment.html>