Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public

Thu Nov 18 12:58:14 UTC 2021

On 17 Nov 2021, at 6:29 PM, Jay R. Ashworth <jra at baylink.com> wrote:
> 
> This seems like a really bad idea to me; am I really the only one who noticed?
> 
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-schoen-intarea-unicast-127-00.html

Workgroup:
Internet Engineering Task Force
Internet-Draft:
draft-schoen-intarea-unicast-127-00
Updates:
1122 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1122>, 1812 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1812>, 2827 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2827>, 3704 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3704> (if approved)
Published:
8 November 2021

Perhaps it was just submitted 144 days too earlier and thus was miscategorized?
;-) 
/John

Disclaimer(s): my views alone.  Contains 100% recycled electrons.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20211118/14a406a2/attachment.html>