New minimum speed for US broadband connections

Fri May 28 13:56:56 UTC 2021

"Bad connection" measures way more than throughput. 

What about WFH or telehealth doesn't work on 25/3? 

----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

Midwest-IX 
http://www.midwest-ix.com 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Abhi Devireddy" <abhi at devireddy.com> 
To: nanog at nanog.org, "Jason Canady" <jason at unlimitednet.us> 
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2021 8:07:34 AM 
Subject: Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections 

Don't think it needs to change? From 25/3? Telehealth and WFH would like to talk with you. 

There's very few things more draining than a conference call with someone who's got a bad connection. 

Abhi 

Abhi Devireddy 

From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+abhi=devireddy.com at nanog.org> on behalf of Jason Canady <jason at unlimitednet.us> 
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2021 7:39:14 AM 
To: nanog at nanog.org <nanog at nanog.org> 
Subject: Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections 

I second Mike. 

On 5/28/21 8:37 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: 

I don't think it needs to change. 

----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

Midwest-IX 
http://www.midwest-ix.com 

From: "Sean Donelan" <sean at donelan.com> 
To: nanog at nanog.org 
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2021 7:29:08 PM 
Subject: New minimum speed for US broadband connections 

What should be the new minimum speed for "broadband" in the U.S.? 

This is the list of past minimum broadband speed definitions by year 

year speed 

1999 200 kbps in both directions (this was chosen as faster than 
dialup/ISDN speeds) 

2000 200 kbps in at least one direction (changed because too many service 
providers had 128 kbps upload) 

2010 4 mbps down / 1 mbps up 

2015 25 Mbps down / 3 Mbps up (wired) 
5 Mbps down / 1 Mbps up (wireless) 

2021 ??? / ??? (some Senators propose 100/100 mbps) 

Not only in major cities, but also rural areas 

Note, the official broadband definition only means service providers can't 
advertise it as "broadband" or qualify for subsidies; not that they must 
deliver better service. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20210528/9250d648/attachment.html>