Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?

Sat Mar 20 20:41:22 UTC 2021

Agreed.  Don't fix what isn't broken.

-----Original Message-----
From: "Mark Tinka" <mark at tinka.africa>
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2021 4:33pm
To: "Randy Bush" <randy at psg.com>, "Rod Beck" <rod.beck at unitedcablecompany.com>
Cc: "North American Network Operators' Group" <nanog at nanog.org>
Subject: Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?

On 3/20/21 20:06, Randy Bush wrote:

> i do not find the volume or diversity on the nanog list problematic.
> in fact, i suspect its diversity and openness are major factors in
> it being the de facto global anything-ops list. perhaps we do not
> need to fix that.

Simple. As. That.

Mark.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20210320/a5ab1877/attachment.html>