WIKI documentation Software?

Sat Mar 14 17:44:28 UTC 2020

+1 for Dokuwiki as well as Gitlab.

I personally like Gitlab but fact that wiki is on per project basis. It is
easy to use Dokuwiki as a general purpose, project independent wiki.

On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 9:20 PM Ray Orsini <ray at oit.co> wrote:

> Confluence is good for small teams. Self-hosted is $10r. Plus addons we
> end up around $150/yr. Unfortunately, we outgrew it in terms of users.
> Additional users are way too expensive.
>
>
>
> [image: OIT Website] <https://www.oit.co/>
>
> *Ray Orsini***
>
> *Chief Executive Officer*
>
> *OIT, LLC*
>
>  305.967.6756 x1009 <305.967.6756%20x1009>
>
>  |
>
>  305.571.6272
>
>  ray at oit.co
>
>  |
>
> <https://www.oit.co/>
>
>  www.oit.co <https://www.oit.co/>
>
>  oit.co/ray
>
> [image: Facebook] <https://go.oit.co/facebook>
>
> [image: LinkedIn] <https://go.oit.co/linkedin>
>
> [image: Twitter] <https://go.oit.co/twitter>
>
> [image: YouTube] <https://go.oit.co/youtube>
>
> *How are we doing? We'd love to hear your feedback. https://go.oit.co/review
> <https://go.oit.co/review>*
>
>
>
> *From:* NANOG <nanog-bounces at nanog.org> *On Behalf Of *Craig
> *Sent:* Saturday, March 14, 2020 11:34 AM
> *To:* Nicholas Oas <nicholas.oas at gmail.com>; nanog group <nanog at nanog.org>
> *Subject:* Re: WIKI documentation Software?
>
>
>
>
>
> Lol, Sharepoint,,,. Arggg, yea NOT going to happen ,
>
>
>
> We’ve managed to avoid using that.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 10:50 AM Nicholas Oas <nicholas.oas at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Seconding Confluence. Stay away from Sharepoint.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 8:09 AM Craig <cvuljanic at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Wanted to ask what WIKI software teams are using to save documentation to
> / how to's for staff, etc.
>
>
>
> pro's
>
> con's
>
>
>
> We have an older wiki bare-metal wiki server, that I want to get replaced
> before it kicks the bucket and was looking into various ones.
>
>
>
> thanks;
>
>
>
> CPV
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 

Anurag Bhatia
anuragbhatia.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20200314/13c20cc8/attachment.html>