WIKI documentation Software?

Sat Mar 14 15:46:26 UTC 2020

Confluence is good for small teams. Self-hosted is $10r. Plus addons we end up around $150/yr. Unfortunately, we outgrew it in terms of users. Additional users are way too expensive.

[OIT Website]<https://www.oit.co/>
Ray Orsini
Chief Executive Officer
OIT, LLC
[cid:image003.png at 01D5F9F6.301C26C0]
 305.967.6756 x1009<tel:305.967.6756%20x1009>
 |
[cid:image004.png at 01D5F9F6.301C26C0]
 305.571.6272<fax:305.571.6272>
[cid:image005.png at 01D5F9F6.301C26C0]
 ray at oit.co<mailto:ray at oit.co>
 |
[cid:image006.png at 01D5F9F6.301C26C0]<https://www.oit.co/>
 www.oit.co<https://www.oit.co/>
[cid:image007.png at 01D5F9F6.301C26C0]
 oit.co/ray
[Facebook]<https://go.oit.co/facebook>
[LinkedIn]<https://go.oit.co/linkedin>
[Twitter]<https://go.oit.co/twitter>
[YouTube]<https://go.oit.co/youtube>
How are we doing? We'd love to hear your feedback. https://go.oit.co/review

From: NANOG <nanog-bounces at nanog.org> On Behalf Of Craig
Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2020 11:34 AM
To: Nicholas Oas <nicholas.oas at gmail.com>; nanog group <nanog at nanog.org>
Subject: Re: WIKI documentation Software?

Lol, Sharepoint,,,. Arggg, yea NOT going to happen ,

We’ve managed to avoid using that.

On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 10:50 AM Nicholas Oas <nicholas.oas at gmail.com<mailto:nicholas.oas at gmail.com>> wrote:
Seconding Confluence. Stay away from Sharepoint.

On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 8:09 AM Craig <cvuljanic at gmail.com<mailto:cvuljanic at gmail.com>> wrote:
Wanted to ask what WIKI software teams are using to save documentation to / how to's for staff, etc.

pro's
con's

We have an older wiki bare-metal wiki server, that I want to get replaced before it kicks the bucket and was looking into various ones.

thanks;

CPV

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20200314/9773629e/attachment.html>