100g PCS Errors

Wed Aug 19 14:21:52 UTC 2020

It's not normal, no.

On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 10:02 AM Nicholas Warren <nwarren at barryelectric.com>
wrote:

> We've got a 100g qsfp in an mx204 that has 1207 bit errors and 29666
> errored blocks after 24 hours of just being linked up...
> I would assume this is not normal behavior, but I haven't used 100g
> before. Do others see high error rates on their 100g optics?
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20200819/b3fce7bf/attachment.html>