"Is BGP safe yet?" test

Mon Apr 20 19:01:54 UTC 2020

On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 3:37 PM Denys Fedoryshchenko <
nuclearcat at nuclearcat.com> wrote:

> There is simple use case that will prove this page is giving false
> positive
> for their "name&shame" strategy.
> Any AS owner with default route only (yes it happens a lot) users will
> get:
> "YOUR ISP TERRIBLE, HIS BGP NOT SAFE!".
> But he have nothing to validate! His BGP is implemented safely,
> its just his upstream is not validating routes.
>
>
So, that same ISP who is not validating because it has a default route
could push its providers to do validation and then be as safe as other
validating themselves ?

Rubens
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20200420/95d02ef5/attachment.html>