Cogent sales reps who actually respond

Wed Sep 18 04:19:01 UTC 2019

On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 10:56 PM Patrick W. Gilmore <patrick at ianai.net> wrote:
>
> On Sep 17, 2019, at 9:46 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 6:46 PM Martijn Schmidt via NANOG
> > <nanog at nanog.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Elad,
> >>
> >> Is this policy officially documented by AFRINIC somewhere? Can you make route objects for legacy AFRINIC resources in their RIR operated IRRDB as a fallback for RPKI?
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Martijn ________________________________
> >> From: Elad Cohen <elad at netstyle.io>
> >> Sent: 18 September 2019 00:40:13
> >> To: Martijn Schmidt <martijnschmidt at i3d.net>; nanog at nanog.org <nanog at nanog.org>
> >> Subject: Re: Cogent sales reps who actually respond
> >>
> >> Hello Martin, unfortunately RPKI is not yet technically possible for a legacy range in Afrinic.
> >> _
> >
> > technically possible to transfer your afrnic space to ripe though,
> > right? and do rpki there.
>
> I do not believe so.

oh :( bummer.

> AFRINIC has no inter-RIR transfer policy. I do not believe the fact it is legacy space matters, AFRINIC won’t let you move it out, and RIPE wouldn’t let you bring it in anyway - AFAIK.
>
> They are the only RIR that does not have an inter-RIR policy. Well, LACNIC just voted one in, but it is not implemented - yet.
>
> --
> TTFN,
> patrick
>