Unable to email anyone from my primary domain name; thanks Google Mail and G Suite.

Fri Oct 25 15:12:59 UTC 2019

On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 07:52:17AM -0700, Damian Menscher via NANOG wrote:
> > There is a persistent mythos -- a worst practice, actually -- among many
> > operations that obfuscating the reasons why messages are rejected is
> > useful.
> > This is wrong.
> >
> > Consider: either the sender is benign (as in this case) or they are not.
> >
> > If they're not benign, then either they don't care enough to acquire
> > this information or they do.  If they don't care, then providing the
> > information doesn't hurt, because it'll be ignored anyway.  If they do
> > care, then they WILL get it, whether by conducting research or by
> > breaching security or by the simpler/cheaper path of paying someone
> > on the inside off.
> >
> 
> Please post your password to nanog at .  Consider: either we're all benign, or
> we're not.  And if we're not, either we're too lazy to read all the
> messages to the list, or we're willing to rubber-hose the password out of
> you.  Posting your password to the list is the most logical way to avoid
> the hose.
> 

I thought we were all educated people on this ML. Please avoid sophism.