44/8

Mon Jul 22 23:12:17 UTC 2019

On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 4:02 PM Jerry Cloe <jerry at jtcloe.net> wrote:

> There's already widespread use (abuse ?) of DOD /8's. T-Mobile commonly
> assigns 26/8 space (and others) to customers and nat's it.
>
>
My understanding is that is not currently commonly the case

https://www.worldipv6launch.org/apps/ipv6week/measurement/images/graphs/T-MobileUSA.png

>
>
> -----Original message-----
> *From:* Michel Py <michel.py at tsisemi.com>
> *Sent:* Mon 07-22-2019 05:36 pm
> *Subject:* RE: 44/8
> *To:* William Herrin <bill at herrin.us>;
> *CC:* North American Network Operators‘ Group <nanog at nanog.org>;
>
> As an extension of RFC1918, it would have solved the questionable and
> nevertheless widespread squatting of 30/8 and other un-announced DoD blocks
> because 10/8 is not big enough for some folks.
>
> Michel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190722/fdc8ccd0/attachment.html>