Special Counsel Office report web site

Thu Apr 18 04:25:32 UTC 2019

Hey Mike.

Agreed. But the scale of a 400 page document with global interest? Should
be highly cached with a good ratio of served to pull bits. I'm willing to
bet you a beer its just another day on the Internet. However, I could be
wrong. Hope to see you in DC to collect! I already know Brett is in. :)

Best,

-M<

On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 12:21 AM <mike.lyon at gmail.com> wrote:

> Oh spiffy!
>
> Will be interesting to see if there are any problems then.
>
> -Mike
>
> On Apr 17, 2019, at 21:14, Brett Watson <brett at the-watsons.org> wrote:
>
> Or maybe do this (faster than nanog archives) :)
>
>
> bash-3.2# dig cia.gov ns
>
> ; <<>> DiG 9.10.6 <<>> cia.gov ns
> ;; global options: +cmd
> ;; Got answer:
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 33203
> ;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 6, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
>
> ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
> ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
> ;cia.gov. IN NS
>
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> cia.gov. 86400 IN NS a22-66.akam.net.
> cia.gov. 86400 IN NS a16-67.akam.net.
> cia.gov. 86400 IN NS a1-22.akam.net.
> cia.gov. 86400 IN NS a12-65.akam.net.
> cia.gov. 86400 IN NS a3-64.akam.net.
> cia.gov. 86400 IN NS a13-65.akam.net.
>
>
>
> On Apr 17, 2019, at 9:11 PM, Martin Hannigan <hannigan at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Check the nANOG archives for examples of whitehouse.gov, cia.gov etc. It
> certainly is.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 23:34 <mike.lyon at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Isn’t this why god invented CDNs? Though, i doubt the govment is
>> Akamized...
>>
>> -Mike
>>
>> On Apr 17, 2019, at 20:26, Mark Seiden <mis at seiden.com> wrote:
>>
>> of course p2p is the way to distribute this but i doubt the justice
>> department can admit there is any positive legitimate use for p2p.
>>
>> (i’ve been surprised that it hasn’t made it to wikileaks or bittorrent
>> yet.  “russiar, are you listening?”)
>>
>> (i sure hope there’s a signed version or at least a hash.)
>>
>> i predict there will be versions with fake content, missing content, and
>> malware inserted that are distributed as well.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> and i’ll bet there will be some infected pdf version as well distributed
>> that way.
>> On Apr 17, 2019, 7:57 PM -0700, fwessling--- via NANOG <nanog at nanog.org>,
>> wrote:
>>
>> And we may still see the web stack being the ultimate cause of the delay.
>>
>>
>> Parkinson's law always comes to the rescue:-)
>> More faster and efficient processing architecture, Hyper transport buses,
>> amd-64 Branch prediction.
>> Massively faster storage subsystems and disk arrays, SSD slab caching for
>> hypervisors
>>
>> And some dude with a AJAX framework to serve a PDF bringging the whole
>> thing to a a screeching halt
>>
>> On April 17, 2019 10:35:29 PM EDT, Sean Donelan <sean at donelan.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 17 Apr 2019, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>>
>> Things will probably be easier this time. The Internet has evolved
>>
>> ways
>>
>> of dealing with exactly this problem. (Avi used to call it “slash-dot
>>
>>
>> insurance”, but the idea is the same.) Specifically:
>>
>>
>> Yep, it will be interesting to see where the chokepoints are tommorrow.
>>
>> In 1998, the bandwidth pipes never filled up. The chokepoint was in the
>>
>> TCP and Web stacks. Eventually the Associated Press got a copy of the
>> Starr Report on a CD from a congressional staffer. The press intern
>> running down the street holding a CD was faster than 1998 internet :-)
>>
>> We were also lucky in 1998, no one had thought of DDOS yet.
>>
>>
>> Frederick Wessling (CIO)
>> Succinct Systems LLC
>> Cell: +1(561) 571-2799
>> Office: +1(904) 758-9915 ext. 9925
>> Fax: +1(904) 758-9987
>> www.SuccinctSystems.com <http://www.succinctsystems.com/>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190418/964bbdec/attachment.html>