Deploying IPv6 XLAT64
mattlists at rivervalleyinternet.net
Wed Sep 26 18:22:03 UTC 2018
Thanks... that is what I don't understand: Why is NAT64 such a
difficult concept to put into routers and firewalls? We already do NAT
with IPv4 just fine.
I feel like IPv6 adoption would be much faster if there was a transition
mechanism other than dual stacking.
Think: Corporate offices. Rather than renumbering everything inside,
they just turn on NAT64 and now they can begin a slow and controlled
On 9/26/18 2:19 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> You can use Jool for both 464XLAT and just NAT64.
> I've done a workshop on this at the LACNIC meeting this week. See slides 43 and next ones:
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: NANOG <nanog-bounces at nanog.org> en nombre de Matt Hoppes <mattlists at rivervalleyinternet.net>
> Fecha: miércoles, 26 de septiembre de 2018, 15:03
> Para: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog at nanog.org>
> Asunto: Deploying IPv6 XLAT64
> Looking at getting into IPv6 here ourselves... one of the big hold ups
> has been the dual stacking.
> Can anyone recommend a quality, not ridiculously convoluted to setup,
> XLAT64 translator that we could run in our network to take the IPv6 to
> an IPv4 address when the remote server doesn't have 6 capability?
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> The IPv6 Company
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
More information about the NANOG