CloudFlare D.N.S. Resolvers... (1.1.1.1 & 1.0.0.1)

Wed Sep 26 13:03:52 UTC 2018

For Window’s clients, you might want to try out this freeware GRC tool for benchmarking DNS performance:

https://www.grc.com/dns/benchmark.htm

Cheers

-- 
Yonatan (Yoni) Radzin
yradzin at gmail.com

> On Sep 26, 2018, at 3:59 AM, Michael Bullut <main at kipsang.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Ross,
> 
> How would you gauge good DNS performance? 
> 
> Warm regards, 
> 
> Michael.
> 
> 
>> On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 at 10:50, Ross Tajvar <ross at tajvar.io> wrote:
>> Do note that ping response times are not a good indicator of DNS performance.
>> 
>>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018, 3:48 AM Michael Bullut <main at kipsang.com> wrote:
>>> Greetings Team,
>>> 
>>> Has anyone deployed the aforementioned in your individual networks? A quick test suggests it is quite fast compared with Google's D.N.S. resolvers:
>>> 
>>> C:\Users\bullutm>ping 1.1.1.1
>>> 
>>> Pinging 1.1.1.1 with 32 bytes of data:
>>> Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=61
>>> Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=61
>>> Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=61
>>> Reply from 1.1.1.1: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=61
>>> 
>>> Ping statistics for 1.1.1.1:
>>>     Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
>>> Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
>>>     Minimum = 3ms, Maximum = 8ms, Average = 4ms
>>> 
>>> C:\Users\bullutm>
>>> 
>>> -------
>>> 
>>> C:\Users\bullutm>tracert 1.1.1.1
>>> 
>>> Tracing route to one.one.one.one [1.1.1.1]
>>> over a maximum of 30 hops:
>>> 
>>>   1     4 ms     3 ms     4 ms  10.101.129.254
>>>   2     6 ms    20 ms     7 ms  10.98.0.165
>>>   3     7 ms    13 ms    15 ms  10.98.0.233
>>>   4     7 ms     5 ms     4 ms  one.one.one.one [1.1.1.1]
>>> 
>>> Trace complete.
>>> 
>>> C:\Users\bullutm>
>>> 
>>> Warm regards, 
>>> 
>>> Michael Bullut. 
>>> 
>>> ---
>>> 
>>> Cell: +254 723 393 114.
>>> Skype Name: Michael Bullut.
>>> Twitter: @Kipsang
>>> Blog: http://www.kipsang.com/
>>> E-mail: main at kipsang.com
>>> 
>>> ---
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20180926/1f7ee8c4/attachment.html>