CloudFlare D.N.S. Resolvers... (1.1.1.1 & 1.0.0.1)

Thu Sep 27 14:10:17 UTC 2018

+1 for Yoni's recommendation of DNS Benchmark (Windows only).

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 9:03 AM, Yoni Radzin <yradzin at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> For Window’s clients, you might want to try out this freeware GRC tool for
> benchmarking DNS performance:
>
> https://www.grc.com/dns/benchmark.htm
>
> Cheers
>
> --
> *Yonatan (Yoni) Radzin*
> *yradzin at gmail.com <yradzin at gmail.com>*
>
> On Sep 26, 2018, at 3:59 AM, Michael Bullut <main at kipsang.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Ross,
>
> How would you gauge good DNS performance?
>
> Warm regards,
>
> Michael.
>
>
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 at 10:50, Ross Tajvar <ross at tajvar.io> wrote:
>
>> Do note that ping response times are not a good indicator of DNS
>> performance.
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018, 3:48 AM Michael Bullut <main at kipsang.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Greetings Team,
>>>
>>> Has anyone deployed the aforementioned in your individual networks? A
>>> quick test suggests it is quite fast compared with Google's D.N.S.
>>> resolvers:
>>>
>>> *C:\Users\bullutm>ping 1.1.1.1*
>>>
>>> *Pinging 1.1.1.1 with 32 bytes of data:*
>>> *Reply from 1.1.1.1 <http://1.1.1.1/>: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=61*
>>> *Reply from 1.1.1.1 <http://1.1.1.1/>: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=61*
>>> *Reply from 1.1.1.1 <http://1.1.1.1/>: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=61*
>>> *Reply from 1.1.1.1 <http://1.1.1.1/>: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=61*
>>>
>>> *Ping statistics for 1.1.1.1 <http://1.1.1.1/>:*
>>> *    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),*
>>> *Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:*
>>> *    Minimum = 3ms, Maximum = 8ms, Average = 4ms*
>>>
>>> *C:\Users\bullutm>*
>>>
>>> *-------*
>>>
>>> *C:\Users\bullutm>tracert 1.1.1.1*
>>>
>>> *Tracing route to one.one.one.one [1.1.1.1]*
>>> *over a maximum of 30 hops:*
>>>
>>> *  1     4 ms
>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=4+ms+3+ms&entry=gmail&source=g>     3 ms
>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=4+ms+3+ms&entry=gmail&source=g>     4 ms
>>> 10.101.129.254*
>>> *  2     6 ms
>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=ms+20+ms+7&entry=gmail&source=g>    20 ms
>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=ms+20+ms+7&entry=gmail&source=g>     7
>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=ms+20+ms+7&entry=gmail&source=g> ms
>>> 10.98.0.165*
>>> *  3     7 ms    13 ms
>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=13+ms+15+ms&entry=gmail&source=g>    15 ms
>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=13+ms+15+ms&entry=gmail&source=g>  10.98.0.233*
>>> *  4     7 ms     5 ms     4 ms  one.one.one.one [1.1.1.1]*
>>>
>>> *Trace complete.*
>>>
>>> *C:\Users\bullutm>*
>>>
>>> Warm regards,
>>>
>>> Michael Bullut.
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> *Cell:*
>>> *+254 723 393 114.**Skype Name:* *Michael Bullut.*
>>> *Twitter:*
>>> * @Kipsang <http://twitter.com/Kipsang/>*
>>> *Blog: http://www.kipsang.com/ <http://www.kipsang.com/>*
>>> *E-mail:* *main at kipsang.com <main at kipsang.com>*
>>>
>>> *---*
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20180927/8470cc65/attachment.html>