Whats going on at Cogent

Bryan Holloway bryan at shout.net
Tue Oct 30 16:11:53 UTC 2018


Let me Bing that for you.

Oh, wait.


On 10/30/18 9:41 AM, Tom Beecher wrote:
> Maybe Cogent refuses to work with Google so nobody can search for 
> evidence of said cake....
> 
> :)
> 
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 4:55 PM Kenny Taylor <kenny.taylor at kccd.edu 
> <mailto:kenny.taylor at kccd.edu>> wrote:
> 
>     I wasn't familiar with it, so thanks for sharing!  The Google search
>     for 'he cogent cake' was entertaining.  Hard to believe that
>     conflict is going on 9+ years..
> 
>     Kenny
> 
> 
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: NANOG <nanog-bounces at nanog.org
>     <mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org>> On Behalf Of Owen DeLong
>     Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 2:54 PM
>     To: nanog list <nanog at nanog.org <mailto:nanog at nanog.org>>
>     Subject: Re: Whats going on at Cogent
> 
>     Mainly I wasn’t expounding because I’m surprised to learn that
>     there’s anyone on this list unfamiliar with it.
> 
>     Didn’t want to bore people.
> 
>     I tended to speak my mind while I worked for HE, I’m certainly not
>     going to stop as a result of no longer working there. ;-)
> 
>     Owen
> 
> 
>      > On Oct 24, 2018, at 04:51 , John Peach
>     <john-nanog at peachfamily.net <mailto:john-nanog at peachfamily.net>> wrote:
>      >
>      > On 10/23/2018 08:47 PM, Ross Tajvar wrote:
>      >> Sorry all. I misread Owen's email. I'm not trying to air his
>     private business to the list.
>      >
>      > There is no secret - a quick search on the terms HE, Cogent and
>     peering (and possibly cake) will give you the answer. Presumably
>     Owen is not expounding because he used to work for HE.
>      >
>      >> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018, 8:20 PM Brad Knowles
>     <brad at shub-internet.org <mailto:brad at shub-internet.org>
>     <mailto:brad at shub-internet.org <mailto:brad at shub-internet.org>>> wrote:
>      >>    On Oct 23, 2018, at 10:32 AM, Ross Tajvar <ross at tajvar.io
>     <mailto:ross at tajvar.io>
>      >>    <mailto:ross at tajvar.io <mailto:ross at tajvar.io>>> wrote:
>      >>     > I am also interested in hearing about this. I think it's
>     relevant
>      >>    to the current thread.
>      >>    Speaking only for myself, there are companies where I have done
>      >>    short-term contracts, and where I am definitely not interested in
>      >>    any further employment opportunities with them.  OTOH, I am
>     totally
>      >>    happy to continue to be a customer of theirs.
>      >>    Further discussion of that sort of thing would not be appropriate
>      >>    here.  If Josh is in the same boat with HE, I totally understand.
>      >>    For the Network Time Foundation (and related projects), I think
>      >>    we've been pretty happy as a customer of HE, but then we're
>     just a
>      >>    small customer of theirs.
>      >>    --     Brad Knowles <brad at shub-internet.org
>     <mailto:brad at shub-internet.org> <mailto:brad at shub-internet.org
>     <mailto:brad at shub-internet.org>>>
>      >>    Please forgive any typos.  I'm fighting a failing keyboard on my
>      >>    laptop, in addition to having a broken finger.
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      > --
>      > John
>      > PGP Public Key: 412934AC
> 



More information about the NANOG mailing list