Whats going on at Cogent
bryan at shout.net
Tue Oct 30 16:11:53 UTC 2018
Let me Bing that for you.
On 10/30/18 9:41 AM, Tom Beecher wrote:
> Maybe Cogent refuses to work with Google so nobody can search for
> evidence of said cake....
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 4:55 PM Kenny Taylor <kenny.taylor at kccd.edu
> <mailto:kenny.taylor at kccd.edu>> wrote:
> I wasn't familiar with it, so thanks for sharing! The Google search
> for 'he cogent cake' was entertaining. Hard to believe that
> conflict is going on 9+ years..
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NANOG <nanog-bounces at nanog.org
> <mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org>> On Behalf Of Owen DeLong
> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 2:54 PM
> To: nanog list <nanog at nanog.org <mailto:nanog at nanog.org>>
> Subject: Re: Whats going on at Cogent
> Mainly I wasn’t expounding because I’m surprised to learn that
> there’s anyone on this list unfamiliar with it.
> Didn’t want to bore people.
> I tended to speak my mind while I worked for HE, I’m certainly not
> going to stop as a result of no longer working there. ;-)
> > On Oct 24, 2018, at 04:51 , John Peach
> <john-nanog at peachfamily.net <mailto:john-nanog at peachfamily.net>> wrote:
> > On 10/23/2018 08:47 PM, Ross Tajvar wrote:
> >> Sorry all. I misread Owen's email. I'm not trying to air his
> private business to the list.
> > There is no secret - a quick search on the terms HE, Cogent and
> peering (and possibly cake) will give you the answer. Presumably
> Owen is not expounding because he used to work for HE.
> >> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018, 8:20 PM Brad Knowles
> <brad at shub-internet.org <mailto:brad at shub-internet.org>
> <mailto:brad at shub-internet.org <mailto:brad at shub-internet.org>>> wrote:
> >> On Oct 23, 2018, at 10:32 AM, Ross Tajvar <ross at tajvar.io
> <mailto:ross at tajvar.io>
> >> <mailto:ross at tajvar.io <mailto:ross at tajvar.io>>> wrote:
> >> > I am also interested in hearing about this. I think it's
> >> to the current thread.
> >> Speaking only for myself, there are companies where I have done
> >> short-term contracts, and where I am definitely not interested in
> >> any further employment opportunities with them. OTOH, I am
> >> happy to continue to be a customer of theirs.
> >> Further discussion of that sort of thing would not be appropriate
> >> here. If Josh is in the same boat with HE, I totally understand.
> >> For the Network Time Foundation (and related projects), I think
> >> we've been pretty happy as a customer of HE, but then we're
> just a
> >> small customer of theirs.
> >> -- Brad Knowles <brad at shub-internet.org
> <mailto:brad at shub-internet.org> <mailto:brad at shub-internet.org
> <mailto:brad at shub-internet.org>>>
> >> Please forgive any typos. I'm fighting a failing keyboard on my
> >> laptop, in addition to having a broken finger.
> > --
> > John
> > PGP Public Key: 412934AC
More information about the NANOG