Whats going on at Cogent

Tom Beecher beecher at beecher.cc
Tue Oct 30 14:41:17 UTC 2018


Maybe Cogent refuses to work with Google so nobody can search for evidence
of said cake....

:)

On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 4:55 PM Kenny Taylor <kenny.taylor at kccd.edu> wrote:

> I wasn't familiar with it, so thanks for sharing!  The Google search for
> 'he cogent cake' was entertaining.  Hard to believe that conflict is going
> on 9+ years..
>
> Kenny
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NANOG <nanog-bounces at nanog.org> On Behalf Of Owen DeLong
> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 2:54 PM
> To: nanog list <nanog at nanog.org>
> Subject: Re: Whats going on at Cogent
>
> Mainly I wasn’t expounding because I’m surprised to learn that there’s
> anyone on this list unfamiliar with it.
>
> Didn’t want to bore people.
>
> I tended to speak my mind while I worked for HE, I’m certainly not going
> to stop as a result of no longer working there. ;-)
>
> Owen
>
>
> > On Oct 24, 2018, at 04:51 , John Peach <john-nanog at peachfamily.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > On 10/23/2018 08:47 PM, Ross Tajvar wrote:
> >> Sorry all. I misread Owen's email. I'm not trying to air his private
> business to the list.
> >
> > There is no secret - a quick search on the terms HE, Cogent and peering
> (and possibly cake) will give you the answer. Presumably Owen is not
> expounding because he used to work for HE.
> >
> >> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018, 8:20 PM Brad Knowles <brad at shub-internet.org
> <mailto:brad at shub-internet.org>> wrote:
> >>    On Oct 23, 2018, at 10:32 AM, Ross Tajvar <ross at tajvar.io
> >>    <mailto:ross at tajvar.io>> wrote:
> >>     > I am also interested in hearing about this. I think it's relevant
> >>    to the current thread.
> >>    Speaking only for myself, there are companies where I have done
> >>    short-term contracts, and where I am definitely not interested in
> >>    any further employment opportunities with them.  OTOH, I am totally
> >>    happy to continue to be a customer of theirs.
> >>    Further discussion of that sort of thing would not be appropriate
> >>    here.  If Josh is in the same boat with HE, I totally understand.
> >>    For the Network Time Foundation (and related projects), I think
> >>    we've been pretty happy as a customer of HE, but then we're just a
> >>    small customer of theirs.
> >>    --     Brad Knowles <brad at shub-internet.org <mailto:
> brad at shub-internet.org>>
> >>    Please forgive any typos.  I'm fighting a failing keyboard on my
> >>    laptop, in addition to having a broken finger.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > John
> > PGP Public Key: 412934AC
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20181030/6e274ea5/attachment.html>


More information about the NANOG mailing list